![NVIDIA GeForce MX550](http://techplayce.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/localimages/csm_Nvidia_GeForce_MX550_dd860f2dc1.jpg)
The Nvidia GeForce MX550 (GN18-S5-A1, TU117-670-A1 Chip) is an entry-level mobile graphics card for laptops. It is based on the old Turing TU117 chip (as the older MX450) and uses a 64 Bit memory bus with GDDR6 graphics memory. First benchmarks show a 17% performance increase compared to the old GeForce MX450 which could indicate more shaders (1024 instead of 896). The similarly named GeForce MX570 is around 30% faster and uses the Ampere GA107 chip.
The gaming performance should be similar to the older GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and therefore demanding games will only run in low settings fluently.
The TU117 chip is manufactured on a 12nm TSMC process and should be rated at 25 Watt TGP (as the old MX450).
GeForce MX500 Series
|
|||||||
Codename | GN18-S5 | ||||||
Architecture | Turing | ||||||
Pipelines | 1024 – unified | ||||||
Core Speed | 1320 (Boost) MHz | ||||||
Memory Speed | 12000 MHz | ||||||
Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit | ||||||
Memory Type | GDDR6 | ||||||
Shared Memory | no | ||||||
API | DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 | ||||||
Power Consumption | 15-25 Watt | ||||||
technology | 12 nm | ||||||
Features | Vulkan 1.2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, GPU Boost, Optimus, PCIe 4.0, Game Ready Drivers, Win 10 / 11 | ||||||
Date of Announcement | 17.12.2021 |
Benchmarks
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2695 avg: 2771 median: 2800 (9%) max: 2818 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2419 avg: 2472 median: 2470 (7%) max: 2526 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5764 avg: 5869 median: 5869 (10%) max: 5974 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5994 avg: 6126 median: 6125.5 (7%) max: 6257 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4807 avg: 4928 median: 4927.5 (6%) max: 5048 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10068 avg: 10320 median: 10319.5 (15%) max: 10571 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 9679 avg: 10005 median: 10005 (9%) max: 10331 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 – Standard 1280×1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 – Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
Blender – Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
Blender – Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 sw-04
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 snx-03
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 showcase-02
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 medical-02
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 maya-05
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 energy-02
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 creo-02
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 catia-05
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 3dsmax-06
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 – specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 169.3 avg: 173.5 median: 173.5 (45%) max: 177.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
ComputeMark v2.1 – ComputeMark v2.1 Result
Power Consumption – Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption – external Monitor *
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 53.1 avg: 56 median: 56 (8%) max: 58.9 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.5 Points per Watt (47%)
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency – external Monitor
min: 0.452 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (46%) max: 0.4924 Points per Watt
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card – Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 07. 05:40:15
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:24:00 +0200 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.038s … 0.039s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.039s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.039s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11110 +0.012s … 0.052s
#7 got single benchmarks 11110 +0.02s … 0.072s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.072s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.571s … 0.642s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.642s
#11 Got 87 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s … 0.657s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.657s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s … 0.668s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.381s … 1.049s
#15 return log +0.035s … 1.084s
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX550 graphics card
![Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3 review - Business laptop is worse with Intel and Nvidia](http://techplayce.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/localimages/csm_IMG_7862_2_2793fd6a9c.jpg)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3 review – Business laptop is worse with Intel and Nvidia
After we already tested the ThinkPad T14 G3 with the AMD processor, we now take a look at the version with an Intel Core i7-1260P and dedicated GeForce MX550. W…
Intel Core i7-1260P | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | 14.00″ | 1.5 kg
![Battle of the entry-level GPUs - Nvidia GeForce MX550 & Intel Arc A350M Review](http://techplayce.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/localimages/csm_intel_nvidia_teaser_d58c3852ce.png)
Battle of the entry-level GPUs – Nvidia GeForce MX550 & Intel Arc A350M Review
Increasingly powerful integrated GPUs are a big problem for entry-level GPUs. Nvidia still offers the GeForce MX550 in this segment and Intel just launched the …
Intel Core i7-1260P | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | 23.80″ | 6.8 kg
Acer Aspire 5 A517-53G-757V: Intel Core i7-1255U, 17.30″, 2.3 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A517-53G-757V
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-57CW: Intel Core i5-1235U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-57CW
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-74D3: Intel Core i7-1255U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-74D3
HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0754ng: Intel Core i5-1235U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0754ng
Xiaomi Notebook Pro 120G: Intel Core i5-12450H, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Xiaomi Notebook Pro 120G
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2022, i5-12450H MX550: Intel Core i5-12450H, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2022, i5-12450H MX550
HP 15-dw4020nu: Intel Core i7-1255U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » HP 15-dw4020nu
Dell Latitude 15 5531, i5-12600H MX550: Intel Core i5-12600H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Dell Latitude 15 5531, i5-12600H MX550