News

Nokia XR21 review

Nokia XR21 review
Written by Techbot

Safety first! The Nokia XR21 aims to be a smartphone that emphasizes sustainability and a long battery life. Not only is it water, dust, and shock proof, but it is also provided with updates for a long time and even gets an expanded warranty. Find out in our test, whether the XR21 keeps its promises.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Mark Riege), Published 🇩🇪

The Nokia XR21 from HMD Global is the direct successor to the Nokia XR20. The manufacturer keeps the same design concept, aiming to offer a particularly robust and long-lasting smartphone to the customers, without getting as bulky as classic rugged smartphones.

This already worked really well last year, and HMD has improved the XR21 in many areas, particularly its robustness. The battery capacity has increased, the refresh rate is higher, there is a new camera, and a more current SoC is also included. To make up for this, the MSRP has increased by 20 Euros (~$22) to 599 Euros (~$656), and the more affordable entry-level model with reduced storage is not available anymore.

Display

6.49 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 406 PPI, capacitive, TFT-LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 

, 114 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: barometer, G-sensor, eCompass, gyroscope, proximity sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n=Wi-Fi 4/ac=Wi-Fi 5/ax=Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 20, 25, 28, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 10.45 x 168 x 78.58 (=0.41 x 6.61 x 3.09 in)

Battery

4800 mAh Lithium-Ion, QC 3.0, PD 2.0

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (OV64B40, f/1.8) + 8 MPix (ultra wide, OV08D10, f/2.2); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (OC16A1Q, fixfocus, f/2.5)

Additional features

Speakers: dual, Keyboard: onscreen, USB cable, SIM tool, 36 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5); Galileo (E1, E5a), GLONASS (L1), Beidou (B1, B1C, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5) ,NavIC (L5), two configurable buttons, impact protected polycarbonate, impact absorbing TPU bumpers, IP68/IP69K, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Weight

231 g (= 8.15 oz / 0.51 pounds) (= 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Rating

Date

Model

Weight

Drive

Size

Resolution

Best Price

82.3 %

06/2023

Nokia XR21
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
231 g 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash 6.49″ 2400×1080
82.6 %

12/2022

Gigaset GX6
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4
278 g 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash 6.60″ 2412×1080
81.9 %

08/2022

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
235 g 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash 6.60″ 2408×1080
88.5 %

11/2022

Google Pixel 7
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
197 g 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.30″ 2400×1080
79.7 %

05/2023

CAT S75
Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256
268 g 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash 6.58″ 2408×1080

The Nokia XR21 is available in the colors Midnight Black and Pine Green. At a thickness of 10.45 mm (~0.41 in), it definitely is not a slim smartphone, but it is still slimmer than a classic rugged phone such as the CAT S75 and especially also noticeably lighter. However, the design still looks a bit aged, with the rather mediocre display-to-surface ratio of 77% also contributing to this impression.

The rubberized smartphone corners aren’t very visible, but you can still feel them. HMD Global calls them dampening TPU shocks. The back is made of shock resistant polycarbonate, and the front is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus. The Nokia XR21 leaves a high-quality and particularly robust impression, presenting itself with clean workmanship.

The smartphone is not only dust and waterproof according to IP68 but also offers an IP69K certification, allowing it to withstand a water stream with a pressure of 100 bars. Drops from a height of 1.8 meters (~5.9 ft) won’t create any problems for the XR21. According to the MIL-STD-810H standard, it is certified against drops from a height of 1.5 meters (~4.9 ft) and can be used in temperatures between -20 and +55 °C (-4 to 131 °F).  It can also be operated with wet hands or gloves.

The case of the Nokia XR21 is made of 100% recycled aluminum, and HMD Global also makes a short environment impact profile of the smartphone available.

171 mm / 6.73 inch 80 mm / 3.15 inch 11.9 mm / 0.4685 inch 268 g0.591 lbs170.7 mm / 6.72 inch 82.2 mm / 3.24 inch 11.9 mm / 0.4685 inch 278 g0.613 lbs171.6 mm / 6.76 inch 81.5 mm / 3.21 inch 10.6 mm / 0.4173 inch 248 g0.547 lbs168.8 mm / 6.65 inch 79.9 mm / 3.15 inch 9.9 mm / 0.3898 inch 235 g0.518 lbs168 mm / 6.61 inch 78.58 mm / 3.09 inch 10.45 mm / 0.4114 inch 231 g0.509 lbs155.6 mm / 6.13 inch 73.2 mm / 2.88 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 197 g0.4343 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

In contrast to the XR20, the Nokia XR21 only offers a USB-2.0 port without giving the option for storage expansion via microSD card.

But at least, the audio port remains. Since connected headphones also serve as an antenna, the port is also necessary to operate the analog radio receiver. In addition, Bluetooth 5.1, NFC, and two quick access keys are also available.

The Nokia XR21 is still delivered with Google Android 12, which is kept very purely. But there are also several third-party apps preinstalled, which can all be uninstalled. HMD Global promises three large updates for the XR21 and monthly security patches for four years, starting from the global market introduction. While this initially sounds good, unfortunately the XR21 isn’t delivered directly with Android 13, although version 14 is already in the starting blocks and the predecessor has even received the update already last year. In addition, the plan to distribute the security patches monthly is already not working, since at the time of this test, our test unit is still at the level of March 5, 2023.

The Nokia XR21 supports all the current mobile communication standards including 5G-Sub6, offering an extensive amount of frequency bands, so that it should be able to create a connection without any trouble in most parts of the world. The communication characteristics are good in the city environment during our test.

Nominally, the XR21 supports Wi-Fi 6 just like last year’s model. However, in the test with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the transfer speeds turn out surprisingly low, even though they remain stable. The speeds are at the level of a rather mediocre ac WLAN. Although the speed was already not outstanding in the XR20, it was still significantly higher. Probably HMD Global will still make some improvements in this regard.

Networking
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000




346 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼38%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




360 (min: 326) MBit/s ∼38%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

892 MBit/s ∼52%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

743 MBit/s ∼42%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz




944 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼55%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz




910 (min: 677) MBit/s ∼52%

Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000




904 (min: 816) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




936 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz




1716 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz




1757 (min: 1694) MBit/s ∼100%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000




345 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼38%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000




372 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼40%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12




630 (min: 561) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AX12




649 (min: 589) MBit/s ∼100%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000





627 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼69%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000





663 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼71%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1473 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼86%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1353 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼77%

iperf3 transmit AX12





528 (min: 16.9) MBit/s ∼84%

iperf3 receive AX12





499 (min: 32.7) MBit/s ∼77%

03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip

Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (320-352)

Nokia XR20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø648 (589-673)

Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (326-373)

Nokia XR20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (561-645)

The Nokia XR21 is able to use all global satellite networks and can even create a connection indoors. Even though the latter takes more time, it still finds a fairly accurate location within several seconds. As expected, this works much faster and is more accurate outdoors.

We compare the smartphone with a Garmin Venu 2 on a short bike ride. The difference in the recorded route is 60 meters (~197 ft) over an almost 10 km (~6,2 miles) total route, but XR21 reported a significantly higher amount of altitude traversed. The route recording is fairly accurate in the detail view, allowing us to attest the Nokia smartphone with good locating capabilities.

The Nokia XR21 offers full dual-SIM support, either with two physical Nano-SIM cards or alternatively, you can also replace one of them with an eSIM. Other functions such as VoLTE and WLAN calls are also supported.

The voice quality is decent. In quiet surroundings, both conversation partners are easy to understand, sounding natural with a low amount of noise. Minor noise interference is filtered out. In speaker mode, we hear some slight accompanying crackling noise, and the microphones record spoken words only quietly.

Selfie with the XR21 (Portrait mode)
Selfie with the XR21 (Portrait mode)

The front camera of the Nokia XR21 has a 16-MP resolution, but since it uses pixel binning, the resulting pictures have a resolution of only 4.1 MP. The pictures are fairly decent and able to impress with an attractive image composition. But the sharpness could have turned out a bit higher. Videos are only recorded in Full HD at 30 FPS, and fast movements can also result in some visible streaking.

The dual-camera system in the back uses a main sensor with a 64-MP resolution. Unfortunately, it doesn’t offer optical image stabilization (OIS). The images are characterized by a very natural color representation but in some places a bit dark. Although many details are lost in low light conditions, the resulting pictures are still decent with the objects still easily recognizable. You can only zoom digitally (8x max). The quality is okay up to a 2x zoom level, but at higher levels the results are hardly usable. The ultrawide angle offers a lower resolution than that of the XR20 but still does a decent job. The depth sharpness is okay, but the images could also be slightly brighter here.

The Nokia XR21 also offers a Pro mode including RAW support. The full 64-MP resolution of the main sensor can also be used. Videos can be recorded in 1,080p (16:9) at 30 or 60 FPS at best. The electronic image stabilization works fairly well, but unfortunately the autofocus refocuses from time to time. Using cinema mode, you can also record videos in 21:9 format at 24 FPS, with the user having the choice of recording at either 20 or 50 Mbps. Thanks to OZO audio, voices are recorded fairly clearly.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

click to load images

ColorChecker

4.8 ∆E

2.3 ∆E

3.5 ∆E

8.1 ∆E

2.1 ∆E

1.1 ∆E

5.4 ∆E

2.2 ∆E

5.7 ∆E

2.4 ∆E

3.6 ∆E

5.7 ∆E

2.3 ∆E

2.9 ∆E

4.3 ∆E

6.6 ∆E

4.4 ∆E

1.5 ∆E

8.2 ∆E

4.2 ∆E

2.4 ∆E

2.5 ∆E

2.6 ∆E

4.5 ∆E

ColorChecker Nokia XR21: 3.89 ∆E min: 1.13 – max: 8.25 ∆E
ColorChecker

27.9 ∆E

49.8 ∆E

36.8 ∆E

34 ∆E

41.7 ∆E

59.8 ∆E

50.3 ∆E

32.7 ∆E

38.6 ∆E

25.8 ∆E

61.5 ∆E

62.4 ∆E

28.8 ∆E

45.9 ∆E

34.3 ∆E

71.7 ∆E

40 ∆E

43.3 ∆E

79.2 ∆E

67.8 ∆E

49.6 ∆E

35 ∆E

22.3 ∆E

12.6 ∆E

ColorChecker Nokia XR21: 43.83 ∆E min: 12.64 – max: 79.22 ∆E

The box of the Nokia XR21 only includes a USB cable and a SIM tool. A corresponding charger is not included, but HMD Global optionally offers one for around 35 Euros (~$38).

The XR21 has a 36-month warranty and a one-year warranty for replacing a defective display.

The capacitive touchscreen of the Nokia XR21 recognizes up to ten touch points simultaneously, implementing the commands quickly and accurately. The sliding characteristics of the glass surface are very good. The ERM vibration motor is powerful enough to be easily noticeable, but it has a rather spongy feedback.

The XR21 offers two quick access keys: one on top and another on the left side of the frame. Both can be configured individually and occupied with either system elements, apps, or an emergency function. The keys can distinguish a short or long press, allowing you to assign two functions to each of the keys.

A fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button is available for biometric security. While its speed is fairly decent, the recognition rates are rather average. Additionally or alternatively, you can also configure less secure face recognition using the front camera, which works very quickly and reliably. The user’s face is still recognized in the dark, since the smartphone increases the brightness of the panel for this purpose.

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The LCD display of the Nokia XR21 has shrunk to 6.49 inches and offers a high pixel density at Full HD+. The refresh rate can be adjusted by the system, switching between 60 and 120 Hz automatically in this case. You can also set it directly to 60 Hz. Nominally, the panel supports the HDR standards HLG and HDR10, but this might be rather questionable due to the low brightness.

HMD Global specifies the brightness in sunlight at up to 550 Nits. We reach a maximum of 503 cd/m2 in our measurements with the brightness sensor remaining deactivated. When we activate it, we are only able to get a maximum of 495 cd/m2 from the smartphone. At 0.45 cd/m2, the black value is decent, resulting in a high contrast ratio of 1,118:1.

The advantage of an LCD is that pulse width modulation (PWM) isn’t used to control the brightness. Using our oscilloscope, we only see a high-frequency flickering, but this shouldn’t create any problems for even very sensitive users.

494
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
474
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 503 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 487.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 503 cd/m²
Contrast: 1118:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

Nokia XR21
TFT-LCD, 2400×1080, 6.49
Gigaset GX6
IPS, 2412×1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408×1080, 6.60
Google Pixel 7
OLED, 2400×1080, 6.30
CAT S75
IPS LCD, 2408×1080, 6.58
Nokia XR20
IPS, 2400×1080, 6.67
Screen

-8%

-96%

52%

-34%

-11%

Brightness middle

503

505

0%

510

1%

936

86%

566

13%

599

19%

Brightness

487

491

1%

495

2%

947

94%

529

9%

598

23%

Brightness Distribution

94

93

-1%

92

-2%

95

1%

83

-12%

99

5%

Black Level *

0.45

0.3

33%

0.46

-2%

0.47

-4%

0.33

27%

Contrast

1118

1683

51%

1109

-1%

1204

8%

1815

62%

Colorchecker dE 2000 *

2.4

4.32

-80%

7.41

-209%

1.3

46%

5.02

-109%

4.52

-88%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

6.6

7.22

-9%

13.26

-101%

2.7

59%

9.6

-45%

7.6

-15%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

1.9

3

-58%

10.6

-458%

1.4

26%

4.4

-132%

4.2

-121%

Gamma

2.22 99%

2.268 97%

2.518 87%

2.25 98%

2.248 98%

2.279 97%

CCT

6602 98%

7098 92%

10050 65%

6664 98%

7173 91%

7309 89%

* … smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 55100 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 55100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 55100 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19024 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The color reproduction of the display cannot be adjusted by the user, so we were very surprised that the white balance is at a very good level. Even though the color calibration isn’t quite as exact and successful, it is still at a good level.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
22.54 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 8.912 ms rise
↘ 13.63 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (22.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.05 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 18.9 ms rise
↘ 23.15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (35 ms).

The brightness sensor responds a bit sluggishly to changing light conditions, but this can be tolerated. Unfortunately, the maximum brightness isn’t particularly high, so that you can hardly see anything on the display in bright sunlight.

In terms of the colors, the viewing angle stability of the LCD is very good. Even from very steep viewing angles, there are hardly any color inversions, but the brightness drops sharply. In the dark, there are neither any noticeable ghosting effects nor halos. 

Viewing angle stability of the Nokia XR21
Viewing angle stability of the Nokia XR21

The Nokia XR21 is run by a Snapdragon 695 5G with 6 GB of working memory. In terms of its performance, the SoC is positioned in the lower midrange, enabling an attractive system performance.

In the benchmarks, the SoC performs at the expected level, placing almost at the same level as the Dimensity 900 in the Gigaset GX6 in terms of the CPU speed. But it has no chance against the Snapdragon 778G from the XCover 6 Pro.

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


1050 Points ∼100% +56%

Average of class Smartphone
  (119 – 1885, n=237, last 2 years)





829 Points ∼79% +23%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


773 Points ∼74% +15%

Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144


693 Points ∼66% +3%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 – 697, n=18)





677 Points ∼64% +1%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


673 Points ∼64%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


641 Points ∼61% -5%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


504 Points ∼48% -25%

Multi-Core
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


3265 Points ∼100% +70%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


2802 Points ∼86% +46%

Average of class Smartphone
  (473 – 5538, n=237, last 2 years)





2657 Points ∼81% +38%

Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144


2095 Points ∼64% +9%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1923 Points ∼59%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 – 2038, n=18)





1918 Points ∼59% 0%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


1787 Points ∼55% -7%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1662 Points ∼51% -14%

Geekbench 6.1
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (893 – 1806, n=6, last 2 years)





1293 Points ∼100% +43%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


903 Points ∼70%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (893 – 903, n=2)





898 Points ∼69% -1%

Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (2064 – 4656, n=6, last 2 years)





3109 Points ∼100% +51%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


2064 Points ∼66%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2064 – 2064, n=2)





2064 Points ∼66% 0%

Geekbench 6
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 – 2531, n=42, last 2 years)





1284 Points ∼100%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (888 – 898, n=2)





893 Points ∼70%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


832 Points ∼65%

Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 – 6460, n=42, last 2 years)





3426 Points ∼100%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


1998 Points ∼58%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1918 – 2067, n=2)





1993 Points ∼58%

Antutu v9 – Total Score
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


773655 Points ∼100% +109%

Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 – 1322448, n=164, last 2 years)





660692 Points ∼85% +79%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


505982 Points ∼65% +37%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


394141 Points ∼51% +7%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 – 409358, n=13)





389336 Points ∼50% +5%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


369861 Points ∼48%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


322933 Points ∼42% -13%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


28378 Points ∼100% +209%

Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144


12444 Points ∼44% +36%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


12113 Points ∼43% +32%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4780 – 28378, n=225, last 2 years)





10720 Points ∼38% +17%

Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


10530 Points ∼37% +15%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 – 10834, n=17)





9405 Points ∼33% +2%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


9180 Points ∼32%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


7090 Points ∼25% -23%

CrossMark – Overall
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


898 Points ∼100% +50%

Average of class Smartphone
  (226 – 1356, n=135, last 2 years)





795 Points ∼89% +33%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


606 Points ∼67% +1%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


599 Points ∼67%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (521 – 604, n=14)





580 Points ∼65% -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


6247 Points ∼100% +72%

Average of class Smartphone
  (411 – 9585, n=164, last 2 years)





5137 Points ∼82% +41%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


4079 Points ∼65% +12%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


3642 Points ∼58%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 – 3848, n=14)





3634 Points ∼58% 0%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


3527 Points ∼56% -3%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


3265 Points ∼52% -10%

System
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


9601 Points ∼100% +20%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2565 – 19657, n=164, last 2 years)





8894 Points ∼93% +11%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


8858 Points ∼92% +11%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


7987 Points ∼83%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 – 8072, n=14)





7708 Points ∼80% -3%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


6635 Points ∼69% -17%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


6296 Points ∼66% -21%

Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 – 11617, n=164, last 2 years)





5636 Points ∼100% +38%

Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


5392 Points ∼96% +32%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


4352 Points ∼77% +6%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 – 4836, n=14)





4278 Points ∼76% +4%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


4094 Points ∼73%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


3988 Points ∼71% -3%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


3847 Points ∼68% -6%

Graphics
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


16001 Points ∼100% +269%

Average of class Smartphone
  (697 – 30125, n=164, last 2 years)





11228 Points ∼70% +159%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


6594 Points ∼41% +52%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


4339 Points ∼27%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3975 – 4426, n=14)





4330 Points ∼27% 0%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


4298 Points ∼27% -1%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


3765 Points ∼24% -13%

Web
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


1838 Points ∼100% +48%

Average of class Smartphone
  (10 – 2392, n=164, last 2 years)





1446 Points ∼79% +17%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


1276 Points ∼69% +3%

Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1247 Points ∼68% +1%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


1239 Points ∼67%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 – 1382, n=14)





1224 Points ∼67% -1%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144


1188 Points ∼65% -4%

UL Procyon AI Inference – Overall Score
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


42556 Points ∼100% +536%

Average of class Smartphone
  (207 – 84787, n=116, last 2 years)





23134 Points ∼54% +246%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (5723 – 9348, n=10)





7324 Points ∼17% +9%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


6693 Points ∼16%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


5039 Points ∼12% -25%

AImark – Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 – 103259, n=48, last 2 years)





10943 Points ∼100% +2305%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (455 – 3080, n=2)





1768 Points ∼16% +289%

Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192


1002 Points ∼9% +120%

CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144


953 Points ∼9% +109%

Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144


455 Points ∼4%

The Adreno 619 is already an old hat, and unfortunately this is also noticeable in the benchmarks, with the Nokia XR21 placing more at the lower end of the comparison field in the GPU benchmarks.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1800 Points ∼100% +408%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


684 Points ∼38% +93%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


594 Points ∼33% +68%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


354 Points ∼20%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


287 Points ∼16% -19%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


1841 Points ∼100% +409%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


686 Points ∼37% +90%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


607 Points ∼33% +68%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


362 Points ∼20%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


294 Points ∼16% -19%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


6660 Points ∼100% +451%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2472 Points ∼37% +105%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


2167 Points ∼33% +79%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


1208 Points ∼18%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


977 Points ∼15% -19%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


6513 Points ∼100% +437%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2464 Points ∼38% +103%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


2179 Points ∼33% +80%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


1212 Points ∼19%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


980 Points ∼15% -19%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


Points ∼0% -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


8192 Points ∼100% +166%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


4173 Points ∼51% +35%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3080 Points ∼38%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


2566 Points ∼31% -17%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


Points ∼0% -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


108 fps ∼100% +35%

Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


90 fps ∼83% +13%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


80 fps ∼74%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


64 fps ∼59% -20%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


60 fps ∼56% -25%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


59 fps ∼55% -26%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


249 fps ∼100% +165%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


132 fps ∼53% +40%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


102 fps ∼41% +9%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


94 fps ∼38%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


81 fps ∼33% -14%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


73 fps ∼29% -22%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


90 fps ∼100% +120%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


68 fps ∼76% +66%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


54 fps ∼60% +32%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


52 fps ∼58% +27%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


41 fps ∼46%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


37 fps ∼41% -10%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


132 fps ∼100% +181%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


77 fps ∼58% +64%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


64 fps ∼48% +36%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


61 fps ∼46% +30%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


47 fps ∼36%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


41 fps ∼31% -13%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


88 fps ∼100% +193%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


48 fps ∼55% +60%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


37 fps ∼42% +23%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


30 fps ∼34%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


26 fps ∼30% -13%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


18 fps ∼20% -40%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


89 fps ∼100% +162%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


56 fps ∼63% +65%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


42 fps ∼47% +24%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


34 fps ∼38%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


29 fps ∼33% -15%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


28 fps ∼31% -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


62 fps ∼100% +265%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


28 fps ∼45% +65%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


21 fps ∼34% +24%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


17 fps ∼27%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


16 fps ∼26% -6%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


14 fps ∼23% -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


68 fps ∼100% +240%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


33 fps ∼49% +65%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


25 fps ∼37% +25%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


20 fps ∼29%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


17 fps ∼25% -15%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


16 fps ∼24% -20%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


48 fps ∼100% +300%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


19 fps ∼40% +58%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


16 fps ∼33% +33%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


12 fps ∼25%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


10 fps ∼21% -17%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


10 fps ∼21% -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


33 fps ∼100% +302%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


13 fps ∼39% +59%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


11 fps ∼33% +34%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


8.2 fps ∼25%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


6.6 fps ∼20% -20%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


6.5 fps ∼20% -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


65 fps ∼100% +242%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


30 fps ∼46% +58%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


24 fps ∼37% +26%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


19 fps ∼29%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


17 fps ∼26% -11%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


16 fps ∼25% -16%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


71 fps ∼100% +223%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


34 fps ∼48% +55%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


28 fps ∼39% +27%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


22 fps ∼31%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


20 fps ∼28% -9%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


18 fps ∼25% -18%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


14 fps ∼100% +289%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


5.9 fps ∼42% +64%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


4.4 fps ∼31% +22%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


3.6 fps ∼26%

CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


2.6 fps ∼19% -28%

Surfing the web works without any problems with the Nokia XR21, but more complex websites tend to take a bit more time, which is also reflected in the benchmarks. 

Jetstream 2 – Total Score
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)


96.314 Points ∼100% +54%

Average of class Smartphone (17.3 – 282, n=167, last 2 years)





86.6 Points ∼90% +39%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)


72.887 Points ∼76% +17%

CAT S75 (Chrome 114)


64.737 Points ∼67% +4%

Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)


62.469 Points ∼65%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 – 78.3, n=14)





62.2 Points ∼65% 0%

Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)


46.44 Points ∼48% -26%

Speedometer 2.0 – Result
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)


100 runs/min ∼100%

Average of class Smartphone (13.3 – 375, n=155, last 2 years)





81.4 runs/min ∼81%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104)


53.8 runs/min ∼54%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 – 58.2, n=11)





45.1 runs/min ∼45%

CAT S75 (Chrome 114)


44.1 runs/min ∼44%

Nokia XR20 (Chome 92)


37.62 runs/min ∼38%

WebXPRT 4 – Overall Score
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)


93 Points ∼100% +37%

Average of class Smartphone (25 – 202, n=93, last 2 years)





93 Points ∼100% +37%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)


74 Points ∼80% +9%

CAT S75 (Chrome 114)


69 Points ∼74% +1%

Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)


68 Points ∼73%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 – 80, n=13)





65.2 Points ∼70% -4%

WebXPRT 3 – —
Average of class Smartphone (34 – 292, n=144, last 2 years)





113.6 Points ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)


104 Points ∼92%

Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)


98 Points ∼86%

CAT S75 (Chromee 114)


93 Points ∼82%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 – 112, n=10)





91.2 Points ∼80%

Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)


69 Points ∼61%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Google Pixel 7


45158 Points ∼100% +105%

Average of class Smartphone (4633 – 74261, n=195, last 2 years)





29902 Points ∼66% +35%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)


25445 Points ∼56% +15%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 – 27593, n=15)





22205 Points ∼49% +1%

Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)


22080 Points ∼49%

Gigaset GX6 (Chrome 107)


21753 Points ∼48% -1%

CAT S75 (Chrome 114)


20342 Points ∼45% -8%

Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)


17816 Points ∼39% -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total Score
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)


2383 ms * ∼100% -25%

CAT S75 (Chrome 114)


1985.5 ms * ∼83% -4%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1502 – 2501, n=13)





1934 ms * ∼81% -1%

Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)


1913 ms * ∼80%

Average of class Smartphone (414 – 10031, n=169, last 2 years)





1909 ms * ∼80% -0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)


1708.8 ms * ∼72% +11%

Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)


1021.8 ms * ∼43% +47%

* … smaller is better

The Nokia XR21 offers 128 GB of UFS 2.2 storage, which turns out slower than we might expect from the specifications. However, this can be traced back to the SoC, since we have been observing the same behavior in all the smartphones with the SD695.

Nokia XR21 Gigaset GX6 Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Google Pixel 7 CAT S75 Nokia XR20 Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

3%

21%

76%

60%

-7%

13%

60%

Sequential Read 256KB

509.76

953.5

87%

841.6

65%

1280.81

151%

991.21

94%

485

-5%

713 ?(303 – 1009, n=49)

40%

1191 ?(215 – 4512, n=231, last 2 years)

134%

Sequential Write 256KB

465.31

454.7

-2%

484.7

4%

879.39

89%

878.23

89%

452

-3%

512 ?(105.3 – 884, n=49)

10%

765 ?(57.5 – 3062, n=231, last 2 years)

64%

Random Read 4KB

187.51

194.9

4%

170.6

-9%

210.47

12%

221.56

18%

174.8

-7%

182.4 ?(89.3 – 261, n=49)

-3%

210 ?(22.2 – 543, n=231, last 2 years)

12%

Random Write 4KB

167.51

39.9

-76%

204.2

22%

253.92

52%

233.91

40%

146.2

-13%

176 ?(70.5 – 258, n=49)

5%

220 ?(13 – 572, n=232, last 2 years)

31%

Although the integrated Adreno-619-GPU is already somewhat aged, it continues to be completely sufficient for most casual games. However, things can look very different with graphicly demanding games, two of which we analyzed in more detail with GameBench.

In PUBG Mobile, you can select the HD setting at best and that is then also limited to 30 FPS. But at least those remain stable. In Genshin Impact, you should forego the highest detail level, since there continue to be some clear stutters with that setting. On the other hand, if you use the medium detail settings, you can already play fairly comfortably, even if the frame rates are reduced.

051015202530354045505560Tooltip

Nokia XR21; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 3.7.0_14806628_14807925: Ø45.1 (25-60)

Nokia XR21; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 3.7.0_14806628_14807925: Ø35.9 (29-47)

Nokia XR21; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 3.7.0_14806628_14807925: Ø28.3 (18-41)

Nokia XR21; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.6.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

Nokia XR21; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.6.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

While the surface temperatures of the Nokia XR21 give absolutely no reason for concern during idle operation, they increase under constant load. We simulated this using the Burnout benchmark, reaching higher than the 50 ºC mark (122 ºF). However, since such a high load will only very rarely occur in everyday operation, we don’t consider this critical.

The SoC is not impacted by all the stress tests, always delivering a stabile performance.

  50.8 °C
123 F
49.6 °C
121 F
47.6 °C
118 F
 
  51 °C
124 F
50.6 °C
123 F
46.3 °C
115 F
 
  50.7 °C
123 F
50.4 °C
123 F
45.7 °C
114 F
 
Maximum: 51 °C=124 F
Average: 49.2 °C=121 F
44.7 °C
112 F
48.2 °C
119 F
53.5 °C
128 F
44.2 °C
112 F
48.2 °C
119 F
51.9 °C
125 F
45.2 °C
113 F
47.1 °C
117 F
50.2 °C
122 F
Maximum: 53.5 °C=128 F
Average: 48.1 °C=119 F

Room Temperature 22 °C=72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 34.9 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 55.8 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.5 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


99.7 % ∼100% 0%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


99.6 % ∼100% 0%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99.4 % ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99 % ∼99% 0%

Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


65.5 % ∼66% -34%

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99.6 % ∼100% +1%

Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


99.4 % ∼100% 0%

Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


99.1 % ∼99% 0%

Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash


99 % ∼99%

Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


72.9 % ∼73% -26%

0510152025303540Tooltip

Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.65 (3.63-3.65)

Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.65 (8.06-11.1)

Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.22 (7.22-7.26)

Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (13.1-13.1)

Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (25.8-39.3)

Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø34.4 (28.6-40.2)

The two speakers of the Nokia XR21 can get very loud, although their sound is only average. Particularly at full volume, they sound very tinny and make clanging noises. But if you don’t turn up the volume too high, you will still get an acceptable quality.

The sound output via the 3.5 mm audio port (SNR: 70.21 dBFS), which is able to deliver a decent signal-to-noise ratio, is better. For a wireless connection, you can use Bluetooth 5.1, which supports a wide range of audio codecs (SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, and LDAC).

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.932.72526.234.43129.428.14028.733.25036.635.8632234.98019.734.110017.937.112518.536.916017.747.120015.146.825015.550.931516.554.5400135950013.467.563014.272.28001377.6100012.880.1125013.880.3160013.777200013.677.1250013.278.331501480.3400013.579.8500013.680.4630013.977.5800013.671.71000013.671.71250013.864.61600013.162.4SPL25.890N0.781.8median 13.7median 71.7Delta0.611.339.441.139.143.531.537.629.832.433.438.126.630.922.320.720.52415.627.514.733.711.437.21043.28.848.6953.610.558.312.262.514.366.411.670.11271.410.271.210.465.111.165.812.769.614.466.214.268.214.769.515.668.816.567.816.558.417.348.325.480.20.646.6median 12.7median 65.12.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia XR21Gigaset GX6

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia XR21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on average 26.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids – on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs – on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Gigaset GX6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids – on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs – only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

The power consumption of the Nokia XR21 is not too high overall. However, it could have been lower at the maximum brightness level, even though it isn’t very bright.

The battery has a capacity of 4,800 mAh and can be charged at up to 33 watts. To do that, the charger has to either support QC 3.0 or PD 2.0. Using a fast charger that fulfilled this requirement, the smartphone is fully recharged after 136 minutes. The 25% mark is reached after 17 minutes, the 50% mark after 67 minutes, 80% after 96 minutes, and 90% after 103 minutes.

Nokia XR21
4800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh
CAT S75
5000 mAh
Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption

3%

26%

12%

32%

16%

8%

Idle Minimum *

0.83

0.9

-8%

0.89

-7%

1.1

-33%

0.7

16%

0.861 ?(0.56 – 1.1, n=13)

-4%

0.877 ?(0.12 – 2.37, n=172, last 2 years)

-6%

Idle Average *

2.29

1.4

39%

1.07

53%

1.5

34%

1.1

52%

1.678 ?(1 – 2.47, n=13)

27%

1.498 ?(0.65 – 4.26, n=172, last 2 years)

35%

Idle Maximum *

2.32

1.8

22%

1.2

48%

1.9

18%

1.6

31%

1.822 ?(1.4 – 2.52, n=13)

21%

1.706 ?(0.69 – 4.45, n=172, last 2 years)

26%

Load Average *

4.41

4.7

-7%

3.27

26%

3.2

27%

2.7

39%

3.41 ?(2.4 – 4.83, n=13)

23%

4.32 ?(2.1 – 10.1, n=172, last 2 years)

2%

Load Maximum *

6.12

8.1

-32%

5.5

10%

5.2

15%

4.9

20%

5.18 ?(4.32 – 6.5, n=13)

15%

7.17 ?(3.56 – 13.7, n=172, last 2 years)

-17%

* … smaller is better

0123456789Tooltip

Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.4: Ø3.13 (1.139-5.64)

Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.299 (1.27-1.415)

01234567Tooltip

Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.65 (3.42-3.76)

Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.65 (5.06-7.73)

Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.299 (1.27-1.415)

In terms of the battery life, just because of its large battery, the Nokia XR21 is able to leave many competitors in the comparison field behind. While it also delivers good run times during our test, the battery life of up to two days advertised by HMD Global can probably only be reached in practice, if the smartphone is used moderately.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) 39h 04min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 113) 14h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p 18h 05min
Load (maximum brightness) 6h 40min

Pros

+ resistant against water, dust, and shocks

+ long period of updates

+ good battery life

+ two quick-access keys

Cons

WLAN slower than expected

mediocre speakers

only Android 12 at its introduction

dark display

Testing the Nokia XR21. Test unit provided by HMD Global (photo: Alexander Schmidt)
Testing the Nokia XR21. Test unit provided by HMD Global

The Nokia XR21 doesn’t really want to be seen as a real rugged smartphone but more as a robust companion for everyday tasks. With its IP69K certification, shock proof construction, and wide range of operating temperatures, the smartphone from HMD Global can easily fulfill this aspiration. In addition, the manufacturer also includes two quick access keys for a total of four different actions on button press. The powerful 4,800-mAh battery also delivers a really good battery life.

The Nokia XR21 is a tough everyday companion with a potentially long life. 

With the competitors, you will also look in vain for a similar expanded warranty of 36 months with an additional warranty on the display. The nominally long update periods is slightly marred by the fact that the XR21 is still delivered with Android 12, even though the XR20 predecessor has already received Android 13. The WLAN speed also turns out slightly slower than expected. On the other hand, you get full dual-SIM including eSIM support. Only the display could have been brighter.

With an even more modular design, the Gigaset GX6 presents itself as an alternative, and the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is probably also an interesting choice.

Nokia XR21

06/21/2023 v7

Daniel Schmidt

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 69%

Games Performance

34 / 64 → 52%

Application Performance

72 / 86 → 84%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Nokia XR21 (XR Series)

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Daniel Schmidt, 2023-06-22 (Update: 2023-06-22)

Original Article:

About the author

Techbot